Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
The majority of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from that is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to find the same effect as smoking cigarettes, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. It also means that they’re taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past couple of years.
The writer does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we must do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the level of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are several reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it holds true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals Smok Novo 2 found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we must do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the number of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.